Broken references
- Callouts pointing to sheets that do not exist
- Unreferenced sheets and self-referencing details
- Missing links between related drawings
AI Document Reviewer
From Upload To Actionable Next Steps. In Minutes.
Catch issues on paper—not in the field. Upload your project construction documents, add your own review checklist, and run a full-set AI review with direct sheet and page evidence.
Full-set reviewEvidence-linked findingsNo Revit required
Product preview
Catch coordination issues early, reduce review cycles
A quick look at how ArchiChecker surfaces issues with evidence-linked findings.
How it works
Simple workflow
No new CAD/BIM workflow. Use it as a preflight before permit, internal QC, or issuance.
Upload documents and checklists
Upload your construction documents, then add or enter a firm, project, or client checklist for the automated AI review to check specifically.
Auto-detect codes & rules
ArchiChecker reads general notes, keynotes, and sheet info so it knows your codes and jurisdictions—including IBC, NFPA, ADA, and other project-specific standards.
Runs the QC/QA check
Coordination, schedule vs. plan, callout, code/compliance, and your custom checklist checks run automatically across the set.
Results with evidence
Every finding links to the exact sheet and location. Jump from the report to the spot on the plan in one click.
Smart PDF viewer
Navigate sheets, zoom, and jump to evidence directly in the viewer. Review and resolve issues without leaving the app.
Advanced CD set analysis
A Full-Set Review Built For Complex Coordination
Before reviewing individual sheets, ArchiChecker builds a structured map of the complete set—sheets, schedules, callouts, notes, and project code criteria. Nine specialized passes then reconcile the evidence and consolidate overlaps into higher-confidence findings.
Six stages · Nine passes
How the deep review runs
- 01
Maps the complete set
Identifies every sheet, schedule, callout, discipline, and drawing type before the review begins.
- 02
Learns the project criteria
Builds a factbook from general notes, keynotes, code data, jurisdiction, and building type.
- 03
Reviews each discipline
Checks focused sheet groups for code, life safety, egress, rated assemblies, keynotes, and legends.
- 04
Verifies references and schedules
Tests callouts against the sheet roster and reconciles doors, rooms, walls, and equipment in both directions.
- 05
Coordinates across disciplines
Compares paired drawings to surface alignment, opening, dimension, system, and coverage conflicts.
- 06
Consolidates the evidence
Merges duplicate findings, grades severity, and raises confidence when multiple passes confirm the same issue.
What it surfaces
Defects that only appear when the set is read together
Schedule and drawing mismatches
- Doors, rooms, walls, or equipment missing on either side
- Fire ratings, swings, levels, or tags that disagree
- Discontinuous barriers and inconsistent identifiers
Cross-discipline conflicts
- Grids, openings, dimensions, and walls that do not align
- Missing supply, return, exhaust, or sprinkler coverage
- Rated penetrations, standpipes, and system locations
Code, life safety, and operations
- Checks against codes detected in the project notes
- Egress, accessibility, rated separation, and glazing issues
- Operational flow matched to the facility type
Every finding includes
The context needed to act
- Severity
- Critical, major, or minor
- Location
- Sheet, page, and specific area
- Element
- Door, room, grid, or tag
- Recommended fix
- A clear next step to review
Ask the drawing set
Targeted answers, grounded in project evidence
Go beyond the automated review. Ask specific questions, compare sheets and schedules, and receive answers tied directly to your construction documents.
What you can do
Compare floor plan to door schedule
Check every door on the plan matches the schedule and vice versa.
Verify sheets comply with codes
Check selected sheets against IBC, NFPA, ADA, and your jurisdiction notes.
Targeted analysis on specific sheets
Request reports on a subset (e.g. egress, accessibility, or one discipline).
AI Assistant
Evidence-backed answers from your project
Active project
Griffin test · Construction documents
Compare the door schedule with the floor plans. Are any doors missing or inconsistent?
ArchiChecker AI
I found 3 door coordination issues across the selected sheets. Two are schedule mismatches and one door tag has no schedule entry.
A-102Door 118 width differs from schedule A-601Major
A-104Door 224 tag is missing from the scheduleMajor
Evidence linked to sheets and schedule
Ask a question about this project…
Start with your next set
Ready to run your first document review?
Upload a project CD set and turn coordination gaps into prioritized, evidence-linked findings.